I support the motion that the maximum intake of non-local students should be reduced due
to the following reasons:
The increasing intake of non-local students deters Hong Kong students from receiving
tertiary education to some extent. As there are only 9 institutions, vacancies are very
limited. It creates an even more competitive environment for students to compete for seats
in university. Universities should cater the needs of local students first, otherwise it violates
the original rationale of setting up an institution.
Besides, apart from studying, students will also need to extend their social circles and build
connections by such a diversified platform. However, the composition of non-local students
is not diversified, a large proportion of non-local students are from Mainland China. Ideally,
students should have chance to meet different non-local students from all over the world so
that they can learn from their cultures. This cannot be achieved if most of the students are
of the same nationality as local students.
Concerning the allocation of resources, with more and more non-local students, local
students’ benefits will somehow be harmed. For example, there are not enough vacancies
in residential colleges to provide rooms for local students since a certain proportion of
vacancies will be left to non-local students. However, halls are set up to facilitate students so
that they can go to school more conveniently. With more people sharing the resources, local
students’ benefits are infringed.
With limited resources, we should act according to the constraints we have .The university
should limit the intake so as to create more vacancies for local students and resources can
be better utilized on local students. Overall, local students should be given the first priority
when allocating resources.
No comments:
Post a Comment